论我国量刑程序的改革.doc

摘要:我国将定罪和量刑程序糅合在一个统一的审判程序中，这样的制度设计导致量刑环节出现了诸多问题。实践中量刑程序存在着“重定罪，轻量刑”、控辩双方参与不充分、被害人很难参与量刑程序、被告人人格调查制度的缺失、法官自由裁量权过大及量刑理由展示不充分等问题。通过对两大法系的量刑程序的考察，借鉴其有益经验，立足我国的实际，应当从建立相对独立的量刑程序、庭前定罪协商制度、完善量刑证据规则、建立量刑说理制度、建立量刑监督制度等方面改革我国的量刑程序。

关键词：量刑程序；庭审模式；说理制度

Abstract:China will be condemned and sentencing program mix in a united trial program ,such a system design lead to link the many problems in sentencing.Practice sentencing program there are “heavy condemned,light sentencing”,both of the accused and the defendant and the victim not fully participate in hard to participate in sentencing program and the victim personality survey system,the lack of the discretion of the judge too big and sentencing reason not fully display.Through to the two big law system of sentencing program inspection,the beneficial experience,based on China's reality,and shall set up relatively independent from the sentencing program,the system,establish the sentencing of the supervision system of our country reform sentencing program.

Key words: sentencing program，trial mode ，reasons things out the system

　　　我国的量刑程序存在着诸多的问题，虽然近年来的量刑程序改革富有成效，但有关量刑程序的理论、认识以及实践也存在着不少分歧。我们必须从我国的实际出发，借鉴国外的成功经验，构建独具特色的与国情相符的量刑程序。