试论隐私权与知情权的冲突与协调.doc

摘要：现代信息高度发达，新闻媒体和互联网络为知情权的实现提供了各种便捷的途径，信息的无处不在使得隐私权显得极为脆弱，而隐私权对公民的安宁生活起到基本的保障作用。隐私权与知情权在本质上是对立的权利，时常会发生冲突。本文尝试对两权的定义、权限范围等有较大争议的部分内容详细论证。并结合案例分析出两权在当代生活中的几种主要冲突表现。要解决隐私权与知情权之间的冲突，仅有学术上的讨论是远远不够的，更需要法律进行全面的规制，本文结合国内外的协调理论和立法现状，提出适合我国实际情况的协调冲突的原则构想，可以更有效的解决隐私权与知情权之间的冲突。

关键词：隐私权；知情权；权利冲突；权利协调

Abstract：In the highly developed modern informational age, the news media and the Internet provides a realization of the right to the truth with all kinds of convenient ways. And the truth that information is here and there, which  makes right of privacy extremely fragile. However, right of privacy plays a role in safeguarding in the peaceful life of citizens in their social life. Right of privacy and right to the truth lead an opposite direction, making the conflict between them inevitable. This paper attempts to make a minute proof of the purview of the more controversial parts, such as the definition of the two rights and the extent of competence of these two rights. Then it analyses several major conflicts in modern life connecting with two rights with the use of specific cases. In order to solve the conflict of the right of privacy and the right to the truth, making academic discussion is not enough; it needs someone to regulate the laws to be more comprehensive. Based on the actual situation in present China, this paper absorbs the combine of the coordination theory and the legislative status in and out of China, propose a principle idea of coordination conflict. And this idea is more effective to solve the conflict between the two rights above.

Key words: Right of privacy; right to the truth; conflict of rights; coordination of rights

随着我国社会主义法制建设的深入和公民权利意识的增强，权利与权利的冲突亦凸显出来。公民既渴望保留自己的私密信息的安全和生活的宁静，又渴望获取更多的国家、社会、他人等各方面的信息来满足各种精神需求和政治权利。综合平衡国家、社会、个人的各方面权益，用法律手段予以协调使之和谐运行，解决公民的隐私权和知情权的冲突已经成为当今社会面对的一个重要课题。