[摘要] 我国民事诉讼法的基本原则之一——辩论原则，与大陆法系国家的辩论主义存在一定差异。并且，这两种具体的制度性规范都不可避免地存在着因其自身结构对某一种价值要求的偏向而导致其制度的不足或缺陷。如今，随着各项民事诉讼理论研究的深入进行和实务中以强调当事人主义为其基本倾向的民事审判方式的践行，我国的辩论原则越来越显示出其固有的缺陷。对我国的民事诉讼辩论原则进行分析，借鉴和吸收大陆法系辩论主义的合理因素融合进我国的民事诉讼立法，强化当事人的诉讼主体地位，维护法官中立，保障程序公正，是完善我国辩论原则的必然要求。
[关键词] 辩论主义 辩论原则 差异 融合
[Abstract] One of the basic principles of the civil procedure law——the principle of debate, has certain differences with doctrine of debate in continental law system. Moreover, these two kinds of specific institutional norms inevitably exist for their own inadequacy or defect, which are caused by their own structure of a kind of value for the bias against the system. Now, with various civil lawsuit theories and practice of further research in emphasizing the parties in their basic tendency of feminism to civil trial, our debate principle more and more shows its inherent defect. Analyzing the principle of debate of our civil litigation, absorbing reasonable factors in the debate system, so as to strengthen legislation subject position, maintain the judge's neutral, safeguard the procedural justice, perfect the principle is the inevitable requirement of debate system.
[Key words] Verhandlungsmaxime debate principle differences amalgamation
提示：本站支持手机（IOS，Android）下载论文，如果手机下载不知道存哪或打不开，可以用电脑下载，不会重复扣费
