内容摘要：我国的《消费者权益保护法》对消费者的概念没有做出明确的界定，这导致了各种理解扭曲，并且致使了各种司法混乱的局面。为此，理论界和实务界掀起了关于“消费者”一词含义的激烈争论。争论的焦点集中在两个方面，一是消费者是否以自然人为必要条件，单位能否成为消费者，二是如何界定“为生活消费之需要”，知假买假者是否属于消费者的范畴。关于这两点争论，本文的作者认为，对消费者一词的定义应从两个方面把握：行为主体和行为目的。行为主体不应包括单位，必须以为生活之需要为其行为目的，坚持主客观统一的原则，考察消费主体的行为动机。知假买假者若被纳入消费者的范畴不符合主客观统一的原则，与《消费者权益保护法》的立法宗旨不相统一。通过这样的方式打假，不能从根源上解决问题，并且会导致市场秩序的混乱。
关键词：消费者权益保护法 消费者 单位 生活消费 知假买假者
Abstract: China's "Consumer Protection Law," the concept of the consumer did not make clearly defined, leading to a variety of distorted understanding of, and resulting in a variety of judicial chaos. To this end, theorists and practitioners set off on the term "consumer" means a heated debate. Debate focused on two aspects of natural persons as consumers is a necessary condition, the unit can become a consumer, the second is how to define "the need for the cost of living," to know whether those who buy fake fake consumer categories . On these two arguments, the author of this article believes that the definition of the consumer to grasp from two aspects: the purpose of actors and actions. Actors should not include units that life needs to be the purpose of their actions, adhere to the principle of unity of subjective and objective to study the behavior of consumption of the main motives. Fake Purchasers Ruobei knowledge into the consumer does not meet the objective and subjective scope of the principle of unity, and the "Consumer Protection Law," the legislative purpose is not unity.Crackdown by this way, can not address the root causes, and will lead to market chaos.
Key words: Law on Protection of the Rights and Interests of Consumers, Consumers, Units , Personal Consumption, the Person Who buy False Goods with Intention
提示：本站支持手机（IOS，Android）下载论文，如果手机下载不知道存哪或打不开，可以用电脑下载，不会重复扣费
