内容摘要：转化型抢劫罪形成的前提条件问题，是一个刑法立法不明确、刑法学理论颇有争议、司法适用有困惑的问题。现立足于实质刑法立场，根据《中华人民共和国刑法》第269条的立法精神，从处罚的必要性与相当性的角度对此问题进行分析，宜提倡先行行为无需构成犯罪；同时犯罪数额问题应要求达到较大，并将“为窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或者毁灭罪证而当场使用暴力或者以暴力相威胁，情节严重的，也可按抢劫罪论处”作为其例外性规定；最后当事人刑事责任年龄的起算点应为16周岁。上述争议论点的明确有助于《刑法》269条地适用更加准确和完善，更符合罪刑法定原则和罪刑相适应原则的要求，符合刑法人权保障机能和社会保护机能的统一。
关键词： 转化型抢劫 先行行为 犯罪数额 刑事责任年龄
Abstract:The formation of transformed robbery prerequisite question is not a clear criminal legislation, criminal law theory is quite controversial, the issue of justice for a confused. Substantive criminal law based on the position, according to “Criminal Law” the spirit of Article 269, from the punishment of the necessity and the angle of considerable analysis of this issue, Prior behavior should be advocated need not constitue a crime; Amount of crime also be required to achieve a larger, and “in order to conceal stolen property, resisting arrest or destruction of evidence and then using violence or threats of violence on spot , the circumstances are serious, can also be punished for robbery ” as the provisions of its exceptions; Finally, the starting point of the parties should be the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years old. Clearing controversial argument contribute to apply “Criminal Law”269 more accurately and perfectly, more in line with the principle of legality and the principles of crime fit the requirements, in line with criminal law protection of human rights and social protection function of the unity of function.
Key words: Transformed Robbery ,Prior Behavior ,Crime Amount ,Criminal Responsibility Age
提示：本站支持手机（IOS，Android）下载论文，如果手机下载不知道存哪或打不开，可以用电脑下载，不会重复扣费
