基于语料库的同义动词的行为模式分析_英语论文.docx

  • 需要金币1000 个金币
  • 资料目录论文助手 > 外语研究 > 英语论文范文 >
  • 转换比率:金钱 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币
  • 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)
  • 更新时间:2017-09-12
  • 论文字数:9892
  • 课题出处:(佩佩教授)提供原创资料
  • 资料包括:完整论文

支付并下载

Abstract

 

Synonymy is an interesting but complicate linguistic phenomenon, which accounts for a large percentage in English. Conveying the same or nearly the same meanings, synonyms prove to be a big challenge for English learners. Though various English dictionaries either traditional or electronic ones may provide the learners with general guidance to some extent, they fail to distinguish between synonyms precisely due to the limitation of space and their basic retrieval function. So it is difficult for English learners to choose the proper words to express and communicate accurately and freely. The appearance of corpus linguistics offers the studies of synonymy a brand new perspective. The present study applies the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) as the retrieval data and employs a corpus-based behavioral profile (BP) analysis method to differentiate the syntactic usage patterns and internal semantic structure among imply, indicate, signify, and suggest---a set of four near-synonymous verbs known for their complex functional patterns and various collocates. Apart from examining their colligation and collocation patterns through analyzing the complements they frequently company with, the study also tries to identify prominent semantic differences and register distributions, especially the semantic preference and semantic prosody. Moreover, this study also has (i) added new findings to the existing descriptions of these target near-synonymous verbs, (ii) ascertained the feasibility of a corpus-based BP approach in the study of a set of synonymous verbs, and (iii) offered some advice in learning and teaching synonymous verbs pedagogically. 

 

Keywords: (near-) synonymous verbs, behavioral profile (BP), distributional pattern, colligation, semantic preference, semantic prosody

 

Contents

Abstract

摘  要

1. Introduction-1

1.1 Research background-1

1.2 Significance and aims of the present study-2

1.3 Research questions-3

1.4 Structure of the present study-3

2. Literature review-5

2.1 Theoretical background-5

2.1.1 Collocation-5

2.1.2 Colligation-5

2.1.3 Semantic preference-6

2.1.4 Semantic prosody-6

2.2 Related researches both at home and abroad-7

2.2.1 Related researches abroad-7

2.2.2 Related researches at home-9

3. Methodology-11

3.1 Research methods-11

3.1.1 Corpus-based BP approach-11

3.1.2 Quantitative and qualitative research method-11

3.2 Corpus and tool to be used-11

3.3 Corpus queries and analysis procedures-12

4. Data and analysis-13

4.1 The analysis of overall patterns-13

4.2 The analysis of colligation pattern-13

4.3 The analysis of collocation distributions and semantic preference-14

4.4 The analysis of semantic prosody-16

4.5 The analysis of cross-register distribution patterns-18

5. Conclusion-20

5.1 Summary of the study-20

5.2 Pedagogical implications-20

5.3 Limitations of the study and further research-21

References:-22

Appendix-24


支付并下载

提示:本站支持手机(IOS,Android)下载论文,如果手机下载不知道存哪或打不开,可以用电脑下载,不会重复扣费